<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Marketing Debate - Internet Marketing and Online Advertising &#187; Online Display</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/category/online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk</link>
	<description>The Marketing Debate - Internet Marketing and Online Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:24:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ever spent 7 hours shopping in IKEA? And still clicked on an ad?</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ever-spent-7-hours-shopping-in-ikea-and-still-clicked-on-an-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ever-spent-7-hours-shopping-in-ikea-and-still-clicked-on-an-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 19:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattbrocklehurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ikea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across a compelling banner ad for IKEA.  This statement is something coming from me.  Believe me.  I am not a big IKEA fan.  One Saturday, a few years ago, I spent 7 (seven!) valuable hours in IKEA fitting out a new flat.  My wife loves IKEA.  I don&#8217;t. Strangely by the sixth hour there, while lying on a mattress on my massive shopping trolley in the storeroom, I started enjoying it.  Stockholm syndrome I guess – well they are Swedish – or maybe they put something in the hotdogs.   Ever since a trip to IKEA has not been at the top of my list of things to do.</p>
<p>This banner, <a href="http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2010/04/ikea_resizearoom.php?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bannerblog+%28Banner+Blog%29&#038;utm_content=My+Yahoo">here</a> ,though and their marketing in general I do respect.</p>
<p>The banner allows you to play with the size of the banner, moving bits of furniture around to create new rooms.  How more IKEA can you get?  Like it. It works for me and it succeeded in me showing my wife.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the comments on the blog showcasing the ad criticise the lack of a logo on the initial banner.  Makes sense I thought.  My wife agreed there should be a logo on it.  But then again she loves IKEA.  I don’t so I wouldn’t have clicked on the ad and then shared with my wife.</p>
<p>Maybe they didn’t put the logo up-front for a reason.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/video/ikea-guerrilla-cinema-ad-projectionists-%e2%80%93-crude-funny-and-effective-but-no-place-in-online-video/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: IKEA guerilla cinema projectionist ads have no place online'>IKEA guerilla cinema projectionist ads have no place online</a></li><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/bank-of-america-guess-what-your-ad-needs-tweaking/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bank of America, GUESS what?  Your ad needs tweaking'>Bank of America, GUESS what?  Your ad needs tweaking</a></li><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/social/im-so-attached-to-gmail/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: I&#8217;m so attached to Gmail'>I&#8217;m so attached to Gmail</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ever-spent-7-hours-shopping-in-ikea-and-still-clicked-on-an-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctors of the World ad doesn’t have to shout to hit hard</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ads-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-shout-to-hit-hard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ads-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-shout-to-hit-hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattbrocklehurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dave trott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online display]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a firm believer that ads need to punch hard on first sight.  That doesn’t always mean you need a blunt call to action up-front.  A recent ad by Doctors of the World shows that less can definitely be more in terms of impact.  Indeed in terms of copy we’re talking none in the first instance.</p>
<p>I’ve had the pleasure of a few conversations with<a href="http://www.cstadvertising.com/blog/"> Dave Trott</a>, a great ad man, and one thing I always remember is him comparing an ad to a martial arts punch.  You are aiming to hit a point just beyond the target so that when it hits the target it is at maximum impact.  I’m probably misquoting here but you hopefully get the point.  Ads need to cut through a world where every day there are thousands of competing messages and where more then ever we are multi-tasking and using multiple media at the same time.</p>
<p>Take a look at the Doctors of the World online display ad. Click <a href="http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2010/02/doctors_of_the_world_attention.php?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bannerblog+%28Banner+Blog%29&#038;utm_content=My+Yahoo#comments">here</a>.</p>
<p>The African mother, huddling her child, with the only movement the sun flickering through the tree’s shade on their sleeping bodies is somehow compelling.  Particularly when it is set against the headlines and pictures shouting for attention on the typical website.  The Elle site here is a great example with images of Lady Gaga et al and talk of her “stress”.   A mouse over the ad and in just 12 words the point is hit home really hard.   “Ah. Someone who pays attention to those the world tends to forget”.  You’re already beginning to feel a better person just by noticing the ad and the desire to click and actually contribute has been sparked.</p>
<p>If everyone is shouting there’s no point trying to shout louder.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/mobile/vuvuzela-gives-developers-something-to-shout-about/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Vuvuzela Gives Developers Something to Shout About'>Vuvuzela Gives Developers Something to Shout About</a></li><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/search/tamar-expose-world-cup-sponsors-for-scoring-own-goals-in-search-%e2%80%93-then-score-one-themselves/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tamar expose World Cup sponsors for scoring own goals in search – then score one themselves'>Tamar expose World Cup sponsors for scoring own goals in search – then score one themselves</a></li><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/bank-of-america-guess-what-your-ad-needs-tweaking/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bank of America, GUESS what?  Your ad needs tweaking'>Bank of America, GUESS what?  Your ad needs tweaking</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ads-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-shout-to-hit-hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank of America, GUESS what?  Your ad needs tweaking</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/bank-of-america-guess-what-your-ad-needs-tweaking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/bank-of-america-guess-what-your-ad-needs-tweaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattbrocklehurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online display]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A current Bank of America Ad has a nice feature: an &#8220;Add It Up&#8221; tool  that is a good example of how online display ads can interact across brands, promoting partnerships. But it could be so much better.</p>
<p>Before you take a look at the ad, highlighted on the Oz site &#8220;bannerblog&#8221;, some hints:</p>
<p>(1) Clicking on “Get Started” is required but you won’t leave the page – all activity happens within this web page.</p>
<p>(2) You need to click on the “tool” that flies across the screen and appears in the ad, then hover it over the GUESS banner ad at the top of the page.</p>
<p>(3) You then see the possible cash savings on the GUESS products through the Bank of America relationship within the “window”.</p>
<p>Click <a href=" http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2010/01/bank_of_america_add_it_up.php">here</a> to see the ad.</p>
<p>This is pretty smart. I love the idea and the tool.  They could make it into a desktop app for use when you visit sites in the Bank of America scheme.  Or even an augmented reality app on a mobile phone for in-store use.</p>
<p>However let’s not run before we can walk.</p>
<p>I’ve a big gripe.  The fact that I had to provide the above hints is a real shame.  They should have made the copy in the ad far more informative on what you are meant to do. Tell people where the GUESS ad is and what they’ll see.  Tell people what “Get Started” will do.  They will have lost clicks from people who don’t want to risk leaving the page, who didn’t know what to do with the device or where and what the GUESS ad is.</p>
<p>Bank of America, users are spending seconds looking at your ad.  Don’t make them work so hard! Tweak the copy, make it obvious for the user and you’ll see your results improve.</p>
<p>Basic marketing principles never die no matter the medium.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-167" title="BofAmerica" src="http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/BofAmerica.JPG" alt="BofAmerica" width="512" height="384" /></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ads-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-shout-to-hit-hard/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Doctors of the World ad doesn’t have to shout to hit hard'>Doctors of the World ad doesn’t have to shout to hit hard</a></li><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/ever-spent-7-hours-shopping-in-ikea-and-still-clicked-on-an-ad/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Ever spent 7 hours shopping in IKEA? And still clicked on an ad?'>Ever spent 7 hours shopping in IKEA? And still clicked on an ad?</a></li><li><a href='http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/search/tamar-expose-world-cup-sponsors-for-scoring-own-goals-in-search-%e2%80%93-then-score-one-themselves/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tamar expose World Cup sponsors for scoring own goals in search – then score one themselves'>Tamar expose World Cup sponsors for scoring own goals in search – then score one themselves</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themarketingdebate.co.uk/2010/online/bank-of-america-guess-what-your-ad-needs-tweaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
